Intelligence you can set your calendar by.
Four publications, one Tuesday each. The same intelligence arrives at the same time every month, whether or not anything dramatic happened. Dates are published a quarter ahead and they hold.
One argument, developed across four weeks.
A single monthly publication asks a reader to remember it for four weeks. A cadence asks them to expect it.
Each month opens with a position and closes with what changed. The briefing takes the argument, the signals test it against the month's developments, the case study shows the same pattern in a decision already made, and the radar states what becomes binding next.
Board AI Risk Intelligence
The month's argument. Three decisions requiring board attention, five emerging risks, the regulatory clock, one incident analysed, and a one-page decision dashboard to carry into the room.
15 minutes · 8 pages
Decision Signals
Five developments that move a board priority. Each states what happened, why it changes a priority, and the question to put to management. Plus what moved on the dashboard, and what did not.
5 minutes · 2 pages
Board Case Study
One decision, examined at the moment it was made. What was knowable then, what alternatives were open, what the record shows it cost, and the rule a reader can apply to their own register.
10 minutes · 5 pages
Regulatory Radar
The month's regulatory and supervisory movement, filtered to what changes an obligation, a date, or an expectation. Everything else is left out.
5 minutes · 2 pages
The quarterly edition takes the Week 1 slot in March, June, September and December. Longer at 15 to 20 pages, and the only edition carrying benchmark cohort data, which needs a quarter to accumulate. It is the artefact a subscriber forwards to a chair.
Published dates. Set a quarter ahead.
A stated schedule is the cheapest credibility signal available and the first thing a prospective reader checks. These dates hold. A quiet month is published as a quiet month.
| Date | Publication | Working theme |
|---|---|---|
| Tue 4 Aug | Board AI Risk Intelligence, Issue 01 | The deferral |
| Tue 11 Aug | Decision Signals | Live duties |
| Tue 18 Aug | Board Case Study | Vendor-borne AI |
| Tue 25 Aug | Regulatory Radar | December cliff |
| Tue 1 Sep | Board AI Risk Intelligence, Issue 02 | Funding AI risk |
| Tue 8 Sep | Decision Signals | AI spend |
| Tue 15 Sep | Board Case Study | Governance cut |
| Tue 22 Sep | Regulatory Radar | Three sectors |
| Tue 6 Oct | Quarterly edition, Q3 | Benchmark |
| Tue 13 Oct | Decision Signals | Agentic adoption |
| Tue 20 Oct | Board Case Study | Escalation failure |
| Tue 27 Oct | Regulatory Radar | Ninety day view |
What this publication commits to.
- Publication holds regardless of news. A quiet month is published as a quiet month. Skipping an issue costs more credibility than a thin one.
- Every claim carries a source. Where a figure comes from practice, it is labelled an anonymised composite in the body and in the sources.
- One argument per issue. Four publications a month tempts a second theme. The dashboard carries continuity, so each issue can afford to hold one line.
- Positions move on the record. When a dashboard score changes, the following week says by how much and why. A score that only ever rises is not a score.
- No directive recommendations into a named firm. Published intelligence supplies the question. Instructions belong inside an engagement, where the authority chain is visible.
- Case studies run on the public record. Enforcement notices, regulatory determinations, published inquiries and judgments, with anonymised practice composites as the second source. No boardroom is invented.
Start with the current issue.
Leave a work address and the current briefing arrives, along with the two open publications each month.
No sequences, no upsell, and one unsubscribe link that works.